Graduate studies at Western
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2008)
|Abstract||cannot understand the language.” This is not intended to cover (easily imaginable) cases of recording one's experiences in a personal code, for such a code, however obscure in fact, could in principle be deciphered. What Wittgenstein had in mind is a language conceived as necessarily comprehensible only to its single originator because the things which define its vocabulary are necessarily inaccessible to others|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Benjamin F. Armstrong (1984). Wittgenstein on Private Languages: It Takes Two to Talk. Philosophical Investigations 7 (January):46-62.
Paul K. Moser (1992). Beyond the Private Language Argument. Metaphilosophy 23 (1-2):77-89.
Benjamin Ike Ewelu (2008). Private Language Thesis and its Epistemological Import: A Study in Philosophy of Language. Delta Publications.
Michael Williams (1983). Wittgenstein on Representation, Privileged Objects and Private Language. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 13 (March):57-78.
P. von Morstein (1980). Kripke, Wittgenstein and the Private Language Argument. Grazer Philosophische Studien 11:61-74.
Oswald Hanfling (1984). What Does the Private Language Argument Prove? Philosophical Quarterly 34 (137):468-481.
M. Shabbir Ahsen, Private Language Questions in Contemporary Analytical Philosophy Analytical Study of Wittgenstein's Treatments of Private Language and its Implications.
John A. Humphrey (1996). Kripke's Wittgenstein and the Impossibility of Private Language: The Same Old Story? Journal of Philosophical Research 21 (January):197-207.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads36 ( #38,186 of 740,538 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,957 of 740,538 )
How can I increase my downloads?