The Russell/Bradley Dispute and its Significance for Twentieth-Century Philosophy
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Palgrave Macmillan (2007)
In the early twentieth century an apparently obscure philosophical debate took place between F. H. Bradley and Bertrand Russell. The historical outcome was momentous: the demise of the movement known as British Idealism, and its eventual replacement by the various forms of analytic philosophy. Since then, a conception of this debate and its rights and wrongs has become entrenched in English-language philosophy. Stewart Candlish examines afresh the events of this formative period in twentieth-century thought and comes to some surprising conclusions.
|Keywords||Analysis (Philosophy History Idealism History|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$17.00 used (86% off) $17.18 new (86% off) $43.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||B1649.R94.C37 2006|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Peter Simons (2010). Relations and Truthmaking. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 84 (1):199-213.
Jan Almäng (2012). Russellian Propositions and Properties. Metaphysica 13 (1):7-25.
Guido Bonino (2013). Bradley's Regress: Relations, Exemplification, Unity. Axiomathes 23 (2):189-200.
Jeremy Dunham (2014). Was James Ward a Cambridge Pragmatist? British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (3):557-581.
James Levine (2014). Russell, Particularized Relations and Bradley's Dilemma. Dialectica 68 (2):231-261.
Similar books and articles
Nikolay Milkov (2001). The History or Russell's Concepts 'Sense-Data' and 'Knowledge by Acquaintance'. Archiv Fuer Begriffsgeschichte 43:221-231.
Guy Stock (ed.) (1998). Appearance Versus Reality: New Essays on Bradley's Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
Sandra M. Den Otter (1996). British Idealism, and Social Explanation: A Study in Late Victorian Thought. Oxford University Press.
John Skorupski (1993). English-Language Philosophy, 1750 to 1945. Oxford University Press.
Peter Hylton (2005). Propositions, Functions, and Analysis: Selected Essays on Russell's Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Peter Ms Hacker (2007). Analytic Philosophy: Beyond the Linguistic Turn and Back Again. In Micahel Beaney (ed.), The Analytic Turn. Routledge
James Levine (2009). Review of Stewart Candlish, The Russell/Bradley Dispute and its Significance for Twentieth-Century Philosophy. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (2).
Peter Hylton (1990). Russell, Idealism, and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Jeff Speaks (2008). Review of Stewart Candlish, The Russell/Bradley Dispute and its Significance for Twentieth Century Philosophy. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (3):509-512.
Andy Hamilton (2008). The Russell/Bradley Dispute and its Significance for Twentieth Century Philosophy - by Stewart Candlish. Philosophical Books 49 (3):264-266.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads40 ( #106,267 of 1,911,657 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #458,010 of 1,911,657 )
How can I increase my downloads?