A liberal egalitarian paradox
Economics and Philosophy 22 (3):393-408 (2006)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesColin M. Macleod (1997). Liberal Neutrality or Liberal Tolerance? Law and Philosophy 16 (5):529 - 559.
M. C. (1997). Liberal Neutrality or Liberal Tolerance? Law and Philosophy 16 (5):529-559.
Bertil Tungodden (2000). Egalitarianism: Is Leximin the Only Option? Economics and Philosophy 16 (2):229-245.
Dani Filc (2007). The Liberal Grounding of the Right to Health Care: An Egalitarian Critique. Theoria 54 (112):51-72.
Bertil Tungodden (2003). The Value of Equality. Economics and Philosophy 19 (1):1-44.
A. W. Cappelen (2005). Responsibility in Health Care: A Liberal Egalitarian Approach. Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (8):476-480.
Mathias Risse (2001). What to Make of the Liberal Paradox? Theory and Decision 50 (2):169-196.
Alexander W. Cappelen & Bertil Tungodden (2006). Relocating the Responsibility Cut: Should More Responsibility Imply Less Redistribution? Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (3):353-362.
Ryszard Legutko (1991). The Free Market in a Republic. Critical Review 5 (1):37-52.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads15 ( #78,732 of 549,510 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,510 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
