A proposed ethical framework for vaccine mandates: Competing values and the case of HPV

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (2):pp. 111-124 (2008)
Abstract Debates over vaccine mandates raise intense emotions, as reflected in the current controversy over whether to mandate the vaccine against human papilloma virus (HPV), the virus that can cause cervical cancer. Public health ethics so far has failed to facilitate meaningful dialogue between the opposing sides. When stripped of its emotional charge, the debate can be framed as a contest between competing ethical values. This framework can be conceptualized graphically as a conflict between autonomy on the one hand, which militates against government intrusion, and beneficence, utilitarianism, justice, and nonmaleficence on the other, which may lend support to intervention. When applied to the HPV vaccine, this framework would support a mandate based on utilitarianism, if certain conditions are met and if herd immunity is a realistic objective.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,882
External links
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Matthew K. Wynia (2007). Public Health, Public Trust and Lobbying. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (6):4 – 7.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2009-01-28

    Total downloads

    19 ( #65,306 of 556,916 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #64,931 of 556,916 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums