Conditioning and nonconditioning interpretations of small-trial phenomena

&
Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (3):518 (1970)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0029318

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Small-trials partial reinforcement effect as a function of the goal approach response.I.-Ning Huang & Jong-Shin Yeh - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 101 (2):406.
Influence of a small number of partial reinforcement training trials on resistance to extinction.E. J. Capaldi & Dick Hart - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (2):166.
Frustration considerations of the small-trials partial reinforcement effect: Experience with nonreward and intertrial reinforcement.Charles I. Brooks - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 89 (2):362.
Amytal and the small trial partial reinforcement effect: Stimulus properties of early trial nonrewards.D. R. Ziff & E. J. Capaldi - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 87 (2):263.
The partial-reinforcement effect sustained through blocks of continuous reinforcement in classical eyelid conditioning.Sally L. Perry & John W. Moore - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (2):158.
Effects of amount and percentage of reinforcement and number of acquisition trials on conditioning and extinction.Allan R. Wagner - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (3):234.
Role of instructions in two-choice verbal conditioning with contingent partial reinforcement.John Koehler - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (2):122.
Reward magnitude changes following differential conditioning and partial reinforcement.James R. Ison, David H. Glass & Helen B. Daly - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1):81.
Eyelid conditioning performance under partial reinforcement as a function of UCS intensity.Leonard E. Ross & Kenneth W. Spence - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (6):379.
Supplementary report: Yoked comparisons of classical and avoidance eyelid conditioning under three UCS intensities.I. Gormezano, John W. Moore & Edward Deaux - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (5):551.
Differential Resistance to Extinction Determined by a Small Number of Differential Instrumental Conditioning Trials.James R. Ison & Allen A. Adinolfi - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (2):350.
Performance in eyelid conditioning following changes in reinforcement schedule.Willard N. Runquist - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (6):617.
Resistance to extinction and the pattern of reinforcement: III. The effect of trial patterning in verbal "conditioning.".Harold W. Hake, David A. Grant & John P. Hornseth - 1951 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 41 (3):221.
Effects of unconditioned stimulus intensity and schedules of 50% partial reinforcement in human classical eyelid conditioning.Dennis L. Foth & Willard N. Runquist - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (2):244.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
11 (#1,045,260)

6 months
3 (#760,965)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Neuroleptics and operant behavior: The anhedonia hypothesis.Roy A. Wise - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (1):39-53.
The pleasure in brain substrates of foraging.Jaak Panksepp - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (1):71-72.
Attention, dopamine, and schizophrenia.Paul R. Solomon & Andrew Crider - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (1):75-76.
Dopamine neurons, reward and behavior.Dwight C. German - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (1):59-60.

View all 27 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references