Philosophical Studies 111 (1):69-80 (2002)
|Abstract||In "Demonstratives or Demonstrations", Marga Reimer argues that quotation marks are demonstrations and that expressions enclosed with them are demonstratives. In this paper, I argue against her view. There are two objections. The first objection is that Reimer''s view has unattractive consequences: there is more ambiguity, there are more demonstratives, and there are more English expressions than we thought. The second objection is that, unlike other ambiguous expressions, some expressions that are ambiguous on Reimer''s view can''t be disambiguated by using subscripts. This suggests that, contrary to her view, those expressions aren't really ambiguous.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Marga Reimer (1991). Demonstratives, Demonstrations, and Demonstrata. Philosophical Studies 63 (2):187--202.
Richard Heck (2002). Do Demonstratives Have Senses? Philosophers' Imprint 2 (2):1-33.
Chung-Chieh Shan (2010). The Character of Quotation. Linguistics and Philosophy 33 (5):417-443.
Herman Cappelen & Ernie Lepore (2006). Quotation, Context Sensitivity, Signs and Expressions. Philosophical Issues 16 (1):43–64.
Herman Cappelen & Ernie Lepore (2003). Varieties of Quotation Revisited. Belgian Journal of Linguistics (17):51-75.
Olaf Müller (1996). Zitierte Zeichenreihen. Erkenntnis 44 (3):279 - 304.
Kent Bach (1992). Intentions and Demonstrations. Analysis 52 (3):140--146.
Marga Reimer (1996). Quotation Marks: Demonstratives or Demonstrations? Analysis 56 (3):131–141.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #85,940 of 722,856 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,856 )
How can I increase my downloads?