David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Chapter 7 of IS we rely crucially on tests for how speakers share content across contexts. We claim these tests can be used to gather evidence both for and against claims about an expression being context sensitive. Many philosophers now rely on these and related tests – Hawthorne (2003) being early proponent (cf. also Egan, Hawthorne and Weatherson (2004), Lasersohn (2006), Macfarlane (2004), Richard (2004), and (arguably) Stanley (2005)). In his reply, Hawthorne raises interesting challenges to our use of such tests. We agree that the issues are important and that thinking them through will help clarify the nature of the evidence they provide. But we disagree with him about whether the challenges he raises threaten anything we assert in IS. We see Hawthorne’s comments as one more stage in an active research program of which IS is a part. Hawthorne's Examples: 'left' and 'nearby'
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Herman Cappelen & John Hawthorne (2011). Reply to Lasersohn, MacFarlane, and Richard. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 156 (3):417-419.
Mark Richard (2011). Relativistic Content and Disagreement. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 156 (3):421-431.
Ernie Lepore (2010). Saying and Agreeing. Mind and Language 25 (5):583-601.
John Hawthorne (2006). Metaphysical Essays. Oxford University Press.
John O'Leary-Hawthorne (1993). Meaning and Evidence: A Reply to Lewis. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (2):206 – 211.
Allan Gibbard (2002). Reply to Hawthorne. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (1):179-183.
John Hawthorne (2000). Reply to Cohen. Noûs 34 (s1):117 - 120.
Rachel McKinnon (2011). Lotteries, Knowledge, and Practical Reasoning. Logos and Episteme 2 (2):225-231.
R. C. Stalnaker (2009). On Hawthorne and Magidor on Assertion, Context, and Epistemic Accessibility. Mind 118 (470):399-409.
William F. Vallicella (1997). Bundles and Indiscernibility: A Reply to o’Leary-Hawthorne. Analysis 57 (1):91–94.
Clayton Littlejohn (2009). Must We Act Only on What We Know? Journal of Philosophy 106 (8):463-473.
J. A. Cover & John Hawthorne (2000). Leibnizian Modality Again: Reply to Murray. The Leibniz Review 10:87-101.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads54 ( #27,855 of 1,096,595 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #258,571 of 1,096,595 )
How can I increase my downloads?