Contextualism, assessor relativism, and insensitive assessments

Logique Et Analyse 52 (208):363-372 (2009)
Abstract
Recently, contextualism about epistemic modals and predicates of taste have come under fire from advocates of assessment relativistic analyses. Contextualism, they have argued, fails to account for what we call "felicitous insensitive assessments". In this paper, we provide one hitherto overlooked way in which contextualists can embrace the phenomenon by slightly modifying an assumption that has remained in the background in most of the debate over contextualism and relativism. Finally, we briefly argue that the resulting contextualist account is at least as plausible as the relativist alternative and should be carefully considered before contextualism is abandoned for relativism.
Keywords Relativism  Contextualism  MacFarlane  Insensitive assessments
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA
    Tim Henning (2012). Normative Reasons Contextualism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (1):n/a-n/a.
    Similar books and articles
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2009-11-11

    Total downloads

    130 ( #5,349 of 1,088,398 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    6 ( #17,280 of 1,088,398 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.