An empiricist defence of singular causes
In Roger Teichmann (ed.), Logic, Cause and Action. Cambridge University Press (2000)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJohn D. Greenwood (1993). Split-Brains and Singular Personhood. Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (3):285-306.
Otávio Bueno (1999). Empiricism, Conservativeness, and Quasi-Truth. Philosophy of Science 66 (3):485.
Jody Azzouni (2011). Singular Thoughts (Objects-Directed Thoughts). Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 85 (1):45-61.
Marga Vicedo (1990). T.H. Morgan, Neither an Epistemological Empiricist nor a “Methodological” Empiricist. Biology and Philosophy 5 (3):293-311.
Bradley Monton (2010). An Empiricist Regarding Science, an Empiricist Regarding Representation. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (239):413-417.
Marc Alspector-Kelly (2001). Should the Empiricist Be a Constructive Empiricist? Philosophy of Science 68 (4):413-431.
Bas C. van Fraassen (2006). Structure: Its Shadow and Substance. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (2):275-307.
Monte Cook (2008). Desgabets as a Cartesian Empiricist. Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (4):pp. 501-515.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-04-07Total downloads12 ( #93,438 of 549,130 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,418 of 549,130 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
