Consciousness and Cognition 9 (3):387-395 (2000)
|Abstract||Possible systemic effects of general anesthetic agents on neural information processing are discussed in the context of the thalamocortical suppression hypothesis presented by Drs. Alkire, Haier, and Fallon (this issue) in their PET study of the anesthetized state. Accounts of the neural requisites of consciousness fall into two broad categories. Neuronal-specificity theories postulate that activity in particular neural populations is sufficient for conscious awareness, while process-coherence theories postulate that particular organizations of neural activity are sufficient. Accounts of anesthetic narcosis, on the other hand, explain losses of consciousness in terms of neural signal-suppressions, transmission blocks, and the disruptions of signal interpretation. While signal-suppression may account for the actions of some anesthetic agents, the existence of anesthetics, such as choralose, that cause both loss of consciousness and elevated discharge rates, is problematic for a general theory of narcosis that is based purely on signal suppression and transmission-block. However, anesthetic agents also alter relative firing rates and temporal discharge patterns that may disrupt the coherence of neural signals and the functioning of the neural networks that interpret them. It is difficult at present, solely on the basis of regional brain metabolic rates, to test process-coherence hypotheses regarding organizational requisites for conscious awareness. While these pioneering PET studies have great merit as panoramic windows of mind-brain correlates, wider ranges of theory and empirical evidence need to be brought into the formulation of truly comprehensive theories of consciousness and anesthesia.|
|Keywords||*Consciousness States *General Anesthetics *Neurons *Reticular Formation *Thalamus Neuroanatomy Neurophysiology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David J. Chalmers (2000). What is a Neural Correlate of Consciousness? In Thomas Metzinger (ed.), Neural Correlates of Consciousness. MIT Press.
Stuart R. Hameroff (1998). More Neural Than Thou (Reply to Churchland). In S. Ameroff, Alfred W. Kaszniak & A. C. Scott (eds.), Toward a Science of Consciousness Ii: The 1996 Tucson Discussions and Debates. Mit Press.
Anil K. Seth & Bernard J. Baars (2005). Neural Darwinism and Consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 14 (1):140-168.
Ansgar Beckermann (1995). Visual Information Processing and Phenomenal Consciousness. In Thomas Metzinger (ed.), Conscious Experience. Ferdinand Schoningh.
Bernard Molyneux (2010). Why the Neural Correlates of Consciousness Cannot Be Found. Journal of Consciousness Studies 17 (9-10):168-188.
Geraint Rees & Chris Frith (2001). Neural Correlates of Consciousness Are Not Pictorial Representations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):999-1000.
I. Sukhotinsky, V. Zalkind, J. Lu, D. A. Hopkins, B. Saper & M. Devor (2007). Neural Pathways Associated with Loss of Consciousness Caused by Intracerebral Microinjection of GABA-Sub(A)-Active Anesthetics. European Journal of Neuroscience 25 (5):1417-1436.
Jackie Andrade (2000). NMDa Receptor--Mediated Consciousness: A Theoretical Framework for Understanding the Effects of Anesthesia on Cognition? In Thomas Metzinger (ed.), Neural Correlates of Consciousness. MIT Press.
N. P. Franks & W. R. Lieb (2000). The Role of NMDA Receptors in Consciousness: What We Learn From Anesthetic Mechanisms? In Thomas Metzinger (ed.), Neural Correlates of Consciousness. MIT Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #62,609 of 722,698 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,779 of 722,698 )
How can I increase my downloads?