Graduate studies at Western
Acta Analytica 20 (1):43-54 (2005)
|Abstract||A contextualist account of modal assertions is sketched that makes their truth sensitive to the presuppositions of the conversation. Support for the account is mustered by considering its application to the context-sensitivity of assertions of subjunctive conditional sentences, explanation sentences, and knowledge sentences.|
|Keywords||context modality conditionals explanation knowledge|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Martin Montminy (2010). Two Contextualist Fallacies. Synthese 173 (3):317 - 333.
Matthew Chrisman (2010). From Epistemic Expressivism to Epistemic Inferentialism. In Adrian Haddock, Alan Millar & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), Social Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
Martin Montminy (2007). Epistemic Contextualism and the Semantics-Pragmatics Distinction. Synthese 155 (1):99 - 125.
Jason Stanley (2003). Context, Interest Relativity and the Sorites. Analysis 63 (4):269–281.
Ishani Maitra (2007). How and Why to Be a Moderate Contextualist. In Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter (eds.), Context Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism: New Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Stefano Predelli (2005). Painted Leaves, Context, and Semantic Analysis. Linguistics and Philosophy 28 (3):351 - 374.
Peter Alward, Comments on “If It Were the Case That Counterfactuals Behaved Differently in Indirect Reports, It Might Be the Case That Counterfactuals Are Context-Sensitive”.
Guichun Guo (2010). The Boundaries of Context and Their Significance. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (3):449-460.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #122,590 of 740,329 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,960 of 740,329 )
How can I increase my downloads?