Conscious thinking: Language or elimination?

Mind and Language 13 (4):457-476 (1998)
Abstract
Do we conduct our conscious propositional thinking in natural language? Or is such language only peripherally related to human conscious thought-processes? In this paper I shall present a partial defence of the former view, by arguing that the only real alternative is eliminativism about conscious propositional thinking. Following some introductory remarks, I shall state the argument for this conclusion, and show how that conclusion can be true. Thereafter I shall defend each of the three main premises in turn
Keywords Elimination  Language  Mind  Proposition  Thinking
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 12,095
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Keith Frankish (2011). Reasoning, Argumentation, and Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):79-80.
Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

159 ( #5,243 of 1,102,053 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

12 ( #19,561 of 1,102,053 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.