David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 69 (4):373 - 387 (2006)
This paper describes a flaw in the teaching of issues related to market economics and social justice at American institutions of higher learning. The flaw we speak of is really a gap, or an educational disconnect, which exists between those faculty who support market-based economies and those who believe capitalism promotes economic injustice. The thesis of this paper is that the gap is so wide and the ideas that are promoted are so disconnected that students are trapped into choosing one or the other position (or neither) and are left unable to link the two sides of the discussion. Such an educational process is not one that produces free and reasoned discernment. In this paper, we briefly relate how we came to be aware of the disconnect and its harms. We present evidence that a pedagogical gulf exists within the teaching of markets and capitalism at American universities - faculty interviews, course syllabi, portions of the corpus of material generally referred to as Catholic Social Thought, as well as references to traditional, mainstream economic theory. Further, we give evidence of the confusion and frustration among students this gulf causes. We suggest possible reasons for the gulf-primarily through an investigation of the differences in underlying assumptions and misperceptions that exist between two divisions within universities. We conclude by suggesting a set of curricular changes designed to improve teaching. The authors' aim is not to change people's minds. It is to change their teaching. The authors believe that these curricular changes will leave students less frustrated and better prepared for a life of significant service - with improved critical thinking skills
|Keywords||business school Catholic Social Thought critical thinking humanities market economics social justice welfare theory|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mary-Ellen Boyle (2007). Learning to Neighbor? Service-Learning in Context. Journal of Academic Ethics 5 (1):85-104.
Nicholas J. C. Santos & Gene R. Laczniak (2009). "Just" Markets From the Perspective of Catholic Social Teaching. Journal of Business Ethics 89 (1):29 - 38.
Alison Higgs (2012). E-Learning, Ethics and 'Non-Traditional' Students: Space to Think Aloud. Ethics and Social Welfare 6 (4):386-402.
Joan E. Sieber (2005). Misconceptions and Realities About Teaching Online. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):329-340.
Stephen Bloch-Schulman (2010). When the "Best Hope" is Not so Hopeful, What Then?: Democratic Thinking, Democratic Pedagogies, and Higher Education. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 24 (4):399-415.
Sylvia Maxfield (2008). Reconciling Corporate Citizenship and Competitive Strategy: Insights From Economic Theory. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 80 (2):367 - 377.
Karl Reinhard Kolmsee (2000). Philosophy at the Core of Economic Markets. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 7 (4):75-78.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #179,239 of 1,102,060 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #52,509 of 1,102,060 )
How can I increase my downloads?