David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medical Humanities 24 (3-4):213-228 (2003)
The purpose of this paper is to show that the standard notion of informed choice is unacceptable and must be replaced. To do so, I examine Foucault's analysis of people in contemporary society, drawing attention to the ways power relations act upon us, and to the possibility of resistance. I show how feminist moral theory can be enriched by Foucault's analysis. Applying this new understanding of people and moral theory to an analysis of informed choice, I claim that the standard notion of informed choice is unacceptable, in part because it relies on a false conception of people. Its “necessary” features—intention, understanding, and absence of controlling influences—are much more difficult, if not impossible, to obtain than proponents of the standard notion believe. I end by offering direction for creating a new, Foucault-inspired, feminist theory of informed choice
|Keywords||Foucault feminism informed choice informed consent power resistance|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Lisa Cosgrove (2011). The DSM, Big Pharma, and Clinical Practice Guidelines: Protecting Patient Autonomy and Informed Consent. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 4 (1):11-25.
Geoffrey Rees (2010). The Ethical Imperative of Medical Humanities. Journal of Medical Humanities 31 (4):267-277.
Similar books and articles
Adam la Caze (2008). A Problem for Achieving Informed Choice. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (4):255-265.
Caroline Ramazanoglu (ed.) (1993). Up Against Foucault: Explorations of Some Tensions Between Foucault and Feminism. Routledge.
S. G. Nicholls (2010). Knowledge or Understanding? Informed Choice in the Context of Newborn Bloodspot Screening. Public Health Ethics 3 (2):128-136.
P. Allmark (2006). Choosing Health and the Inner Citadel. Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (1):3-6.
M. Sheehan (2011). Can Broad Consent Be Informed Consent? Public Health Ethics 4 (3):226-235.
Jason Shepard & Shane Reuter (2012). Neuroscience, Choice, and the Free Will Debate. American Journal of Bioethics - Neuroscience 3 (3):7-11.
Victoria Seavilleklein (2009). Challenging the Rhetoric of Choice in Prenatal Screening. Bioethics 23 (1):68-77.
Johanna Oksala (2011). Sexual Experience: Foucault, Phenomenology, and Feminist Theory. Hypatia 26 (1):207-223.
Dianna Taylor (2003). Practicing Politics with Foucault and Kant: Toward a Critical Life. Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (3):259-280.
Ian Leask (2011). Beyond Subjection: Notes on the Later Foucault and Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (s1):57-73.
Aurelia Armstrong (2003). Foucault and Feminism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Colin Bird (2000). The Possibility of Self-Government. American Political Science Review 94 (3):563-577.
Jason Hanna (2012). Paternalism and the Ill-Informed Agent. Journal of Ethics 16 (4):421-439.
Christopher Cordner (2004). Foucault and Ethical Universality. Inquiry 47 (6):580 – 596.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads15 ( #297,181 of 1,941,072 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #458,101 of 1,941,072 )
How can I increase my downloads?