David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The presence of parasites in a population has an impact on mate choice and has substantial evolutionary significance. A relatively unexplored aspect of this dynamic is whether or not the presence of parasites increases the likelihood of hybridization events, which also have a significant role in ecological adaptation. One explanation of increased hybridization in some areas and not others is that stress from parasites results in selection for an increase of novel genotypes. Two swordtail species Xiphophorus birchmanni and Xiphophorus malinche maintain an active hybrid zone. The patterns of hybridization are unique in that they do not match up directly with expectations. We set out to test whether or not individuals can sense, using chemical cues, whether conspecifics in their immediate vicinity have high parasite loads and also whether this has an effect on mating and association behavior toward both conspecific and hybrid mates. Our hypothesis being that females will have greater association times with hybrid/heterospecific mates if conscpecifics are heavily parasitized. We found that females exposed to parasitized males had a weaker preference for conspecific odor than those exposed to unparasitized males, both relative to a water control and relative to hybrids. The empirical investigation described above is coupled with a historical and philosophical discussion of some of the issues surrounding the acceptance and understanding of the concept of hybridization. This discussion takes as its major themes: an analysis of the role that social views have on the formation of scientific hypothesis; the lag between epochal change in the scientific community and the assimilation of the consequences into social beliefs; the survival of hierarchical and teleological thinking in our concept of species and purity; and the failures of contemporary evolutionary theory to provide satisfactory explanations about the meaning and upshot of hybridization. Two specific misconceptions about hybridization are addressed. First, that hybridization clashes with the belief in kinds/types/species having separate and pure identities. Secondly, the teleological view that reads purpose into nature and places all instances of variation on a hierarchical scale; the top and bottom of which are determined by estimated closeness to the predetermined perfection of a type. < <
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Chan Kwok-Bun & Peter J. Peverelli (2010). Cultural Hybridization: A Third Way Between Divergence and Convergence. World Futures 66 (3 & 4):219 – 242.
Peter J. Peverelli & Chan Kwok-Bun (2011). Cultural Hybridization: A Third Way Between Divergence and Convergence. World Futures 66 (3):219-242.
Michael Gibbert, James A. Hampton, Zachary Estes & David Mazursky (2012). The Curious Case of the Refrigerator–TV: Similarity and Hybridization. Cognitive Science 36 (6):992-1018.
Katsuhiko Sano (2009). Hybrid Counterfactual Logics. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 18 (4):515-539.
Katsuhiko Sano (2009). Hybrid Counterfactual Logics David Lewis Meets Arthur Prior Again. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 18 (4):515-539.
Gregg Lahood (2008). Paradise Bound: A Perennial Tradition or an Unseen Process of Cosmological Hybridization? Anthropology of Consciousness 19 (2):155-189.
Carl Chung (2003). On the Origin of the Typological/Population Distinction in Ernst Mayr's Changing Views of Species, 1942-1959. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 34 (2):277-296.
Hugo de Vries (1909). Fertilization and Hybridization. The Monist 19 (4):514-555.
Dario Giacomoni (1993). The Origin of DNA:RNA Hybridization. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 26 (1):89 - 107.
V. Orel & M. Vávra (1968). Mendel's Program for the Hybridization of Apple Trees. Journal of the History of Biology 1 (2):219 - 224.
Yvonne Spielmann (2003). Hybridization: Some Reflections on the Technologies and Aesthetics of Contemporary Media Cultures. Art Inquiry. Recherches Sur les Arts 5:155-178.
Carlos Areces, Patrick Blackburn, Antonia Huertas & María Manzano (2013). Completeness in Hybrid Type Theory. Journal of Philosophical Logic (2-3):1-30.
Robert T. Pennock & Benjamin E. Beckmann, HybrID: A Hybridization of Indirect and Direct Encodings for Evolutionary Computation.
Wolfgang Grassl (2011). Hybrid Forms of Business: The Logic of Gift in the Commercial World. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 100 (S1):109-123.
Added to index2012-02-17
Total downloads2 ( #534,721 of 1,725,806 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,716 of 1,725,806 )
How can I increase my downloads?