How changes in one's preferences can affect one's freedom (and how they cannot): A reply to dowding and Van hees
Economics and Philosophy 24 (1):81-96 (2008)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesIan Carter (2004). A Measure of Freedom. OUP Oxford.
Martin van Hees (1997). Causing Harm. A Logico-Legal Study. By Lennart Aqvist and Philip Mullock. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 1989. Pp. 353. Ratio Juris 10 (3):351-355.
Tomoyuki Yamada (2008). Logical Dynamics of Some Speech Acts That Affect Obligations and Preferences. Synthese 165 (2):295 - 315.
Martin van Hees & Olivier Roy (2007). Intentions and Plans in Decision and Game Theory. In Bruno Verbeek (ed.), Reasons and Intentions. Ashgate Pub. Ltd..
Keith Dowding (2006). Can Capabilities Reconcile Freedom and Equality? Journal of Political Philosophy 14 (3):323–336.
Martin van Hees (1998). On the Analysis of Negative Freedom. Theory and Decision 45 (2):175-197.
Martin van Hees (2003). Acting Autonomously Versus Not Acting Heteronomously. Theory and Decision 54 (4):337-355.
Keith Dowding & Martin van Hees (2008). Counterfactual Success Again: Response to Carter and Kramer. Economics and Philosophy 24 (1):97-103.
Keith Dowding & Martin van Hees (2007). Counterfactual Success and Negative Freedom. Economics and Philosophy 23 (2):141-162.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads23 ( #53,813 of 549,069 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,252 of 549,069 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
