|Abstract||In Moral Thinking R. M. Hare offers a very influential defense of utilitarianism against "intuitive" objections. Hare's argument is roughly that utilitarianism conflicts with defensible moral intuitions only in unusual cases and that, in such cases, even defensible moral intuitions are unreliable. This paper reconstructs Hare's arguments and argues that they presuppose the success of his problematic "proof" of utilitarianism. Contrary to what many have thought, Hare's negative defense of utilitarianism against intuitive objections is not separable from his "proof". In the second part of the paper I argue that Hare does not succeed in defending utilitarianism against the objection that it is "too demanding". The final section of the paper sketches a substantially revised version of Hare's reply to intuitive objections. So revised, the argument is independent of Hare's proof and affords a plausible answer to the objection that utilitarianism is "too..|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Tom Carson (1993). Hare on Utilitarianism and Intuitive Morality. Erkenntnis 39 (3):305 - 331.
Thomas L. Carson (1986). Hare's Defense of Utilitarianism. Philosophical Studies 50 (1):97 - 115.
Wlodek Rabinowicz & Bertil Strömberg (1996). What If I Were in His Shoes? On Hare's Argument for Preference Utilitarianism. Theoria 62 (1-2):95-123.
Harold J. White (1969). An Analysis of Hare's Application of the Thesis of Universalizability in His Moral Arguments. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 47 (2):174-183.
Scott Forschler (2013). Kantian and Consequentialist Ethics: The Gap Can Be Bridged. Metaphilosophy 44 (1-2):88-104.
Alison Hills (2010). Utilitarianism, Contractualism and Demandingness. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (239):225-242.
R. Jo Kornegay (2004). Hare's Utilitarianism and the Free-Rider Problem. Dialogue 43 (3):419-442.
Michael McDermott (1983). Hare's Argument for Utilitarianism. Philosophical Quarterly 33 (133):386-391.
James W. McGray (1986). From Universal Prescriptivism to Utilitarianism. Philosophy Research Archives 12:79-86.
Thomas L. Carson (1983). Utilitarianism and the Wrongness of Killing. Erkenntnis 20 (1):49 - 60.
Jörg Schroth (2008). Distributive Justice and Welfarism in Utilitarianism. Inquiry 51 (2):123-146.
Roger Paden (1999). Adu-Amankwah, Patrick A. The Moral Philosophy of R. M. Hare: A Vindication of Utilitarianism. The Review of Metaphysics 53 (1):141-142.
Matej Sušnik (2009). The Amoralist Objection and the Method of Moral Reasoning. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (1):91-100.
Ingmar Persson (1983). Hare on Universal Prescriptivism and Utilitarianism. Analysis 43 (1):43 - 49.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads13 ( #95,467 of 722,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,745 )
How can I increase my downloads?