Graduate studies at Western
Oxford University Press (1983)
|Abstract||In this sequence of philosophical essays about natural science, the author argues that fundamental explanatory laws, the deepest and most admired successes of modern physics, do not in fact describe regularities that exist in nature. Cartwright draws from many real-life examples to propound a novel distinction: that theoretical entities, and the complex and localized laws that describe them, can be interpreted realistically, but the simple unifying laws of basic theory cannot.|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$27.12 used (40% off) $38.59 new (15% off) $40.10 direct from Amazon (11% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||QC6.C3586 1983|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Nancy Cartwright (1980). The Reality of Causes in a World of Instrumental Laws. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:38 - 48.
R. Vihalemm (2003). Are Laws of Nature and Scientific Theories Peculiar in Chemistry? Scrutinizing Mendeleev's Discovery. Foundations of Chemistry 5 (1):7-22.
Malcolm R. Forster (1985). Book Review:How the Laws of Physics Lie Nancy Cartwright. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 52 (3):478-.
Victor J. Stenger (2006). The Comprehensible Cosmos: Where Do the Laws of Physics Come From? Prometheus Books.
Martin Carrier (1998). In Defense of Psychological Laws. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (3):217 – 232.
Mehmet Elgin & Elliott Sober (2002). Cartwright on Explanation and Idealization. Erkenntnis 57 (3):441 - 450.
Renat Nugayev (1991). The Fundamental Laws of Physics Can Tell the Truth. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (1):79 – 87.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads112 ( #6,269 of 738,614 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,337 of 738,614 )
How can I increase my downloads?