Infinite Accumulations and Pantheistic Implications
The Leibniz Review 7:1-24 (1997)
| Abstract | Throughout his early writings, Leibniz was concerned with developing an acceptable account of God's relationship to the created world. In some of these early writings, he endorsed the idea that this relationship was similar to the human soul's relationship to the body. Though he eventually came to reject this idea, theanima mundi thesis remained the topic of several essays and correspondences during his career, culminating in the correspondence with Clarke. At first glance,Leibniz's discussions of this thesis may seem less important in comparison to others, since it might seem like a topic which is far removed from what are regarded as his most important philosophical doctrines. I hope to show in what follows that such a view is mistaken. The large amount of attention Leibniz paid to this thesis is a sure indication of its importance to him. Further, as we shall see, his discussions of this thesis tum on some of his most interesting metaphysical topics, including the development of his thinking about the actual infinite, the structure of organic wholes, and the relationship between God and the created universe. In what follows, I examine these discussions chronologically, from the De Summa Rerum (1675-6), to the correspondence with Clarke (1715-6) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesNicholas Okrent (2000). Leibniz on Substance and God in “That a Most Perfect Being Is Possible”. Philosophy and Theology 12 (1):79-93.
Ohad Nachtomy (2011). A Tale of Two Thinkers, One Meeting, and Three Degrees of Infinity: Leibniz and Spinoza (1675–8). British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (5):935-961.
Gregory Brown (2000). Leibniz on Wholes, Unities, and Infinite Number. The Leibniz Review 10:21-51.
Ursula Goldenbaum (2007). Why Shouldn't Leibniz Have Studied Spinoza? The Leibniz Review 17:107-138.
Richard Arthur (2001). Leibniz on Infinite Number, Infinite Wholes, and the Whole World. The Leibniz Review 11:103-116.
Jack D. Davidson (2003). Leibniz on the Labyrinth of Freedom. The Leibniz Review 13:19-43.
R. M. (2003). Leibniz and the Post-Copernican Universe. Koyre Revisited. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (2):309-327.
Richard Arthur (1999). Infinite Number and the World Soul; in Defence of Carlin and Leibniz. The Leibniz Review 9:105-116.
Mark A. Kulstad (2008). Newton, Spinoza, Stoics and Others. The Leibniz Review 18:81-121.
Don Lodzinski (1995). Empty Time and the Eternality of God. Religious Studies 31 (2):187 - 195.
Brandon C. Look (2009). Leibniz and Locke on Natural Kinds. In Vlad Alexandrescu (ed.), Branching Off: The Early Moderns in Quest for the Unity of Knowledge. Zeta Books.
A. W. Moore (1990/2002). The Infinite. Routledge.
Paul Lodge (2010). The Empirical Grounds for Leibniz's 'Real Metaphysics'. The Leibniz Review 20:13-36.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2012-03-18Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
