Mental health tribunals: Rights drowning in un-'chartered' health waters?

Abstract
This article assesses features of mental heath legislation relating to compulsory treatment and mental health tribunal processes against domestic 'Charters' of rights recently enacted in Victoria and the Australian Capital Territory. It is argued that genuinely interdisciplinary, multi-member mental health tribunals are vital to the quality of decision-making, and mental health tribunals should be funded to enable them to spend adequate time assessing the merits of each case in line with civil rights standards for prompt and fair hearings, especially where individual liberty is at stake. Because overseas research demonstrates that mental health is a very special jurisdiction, the article summarises those findings before turning to the human rights implications.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,404
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

8 ( #172,935 of 1,102,989 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #297,509 of 1,102,989 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.