Graduate studies at Western
Argumentation 26 (1):143-159 (2012)
|Abstract||The article deals with the question of persuasion by comparing two passages taken from a text written by Victor Hugo entitled Claude Gueux The first passage is taken from the first part of the text in which Hugo tells the story of the murder of the director of the Clairvaux prison workshop perpetrated by a prisoner, Claude Gueux, followed by the latter’s trial and execution. The second passage studied is taken from the second part of the text in which Hugo argues against the death penalty. This article begins with an intuitive sense that the styles of these passages are “different”: the second one clearly shows Hugo’s persuasive intention, which is to say his effort to make his position be accepted. That said, does this extract have semantic properties that the descriptive passage does not have? The hypothesis advanced is that the organization of contents is of a similar nature in both passages of Claude Gueux and that it is only in an enunciative way that the passages are distinguishable. This enunciative difference allows the militant passage’s locutor to portray himself in a favorable light and, herewith, to convince the reader to his point of view. It is, hence, but in an indirect manner that Hugo’s persuasive intention appears; as it is without a semantic mark|
|Keywords||Narrative Argumentation Enunciation Ethos Persuasion Victor Hugo|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Peder Roberts (2003). Hugo Decleir and Claude De Broyer (Eds.),The `Belgica' Expedition Centennial: Perspectives on Antarctic Science and History. Brussels: VUB Press, 2001. [REVIEW] Metascience 12 (3):345-348.
Thomas Dutoit (2012). Kant's Retreat, Hugo's Advance, Freud's Erection; or, Derrida's Displacements in His Death Penalty Lectures. Southern Journal of Philosophy 50:107-135.
Steven Monte (1999). Victor Hugo. Philosophy and Literature 23 (1):230-233.
Jon Miller, Hugo Grotius. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Graham Robb (1999). Book Review: Victor Hugo. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Literature 23 (1).
George P. Klubertanz (1947). The Theory of Knowledge of Hugo of St. Victor. The Modern Schoolman 24 (2):122-122.
Joseph Agassi (1986). On Hugo Bergman's Contribution to Epistemology. In Abraham Zvie Bar-On (ed.), On Shmuel Hugo Bergman's Philosophy. Distributed in the U.S.A. By Humanities Press.
Fernand Vial (1943). Victor Hugo Et les Illuminés de Son Temps. Thought 18 (4):730-731.
Amir Biglari (2009). Temporality and Aspectuality in Victor Hugo's Les Contemplations. Semiotics:262-266.
Adelbert W. Centner (1933). Die Wirksamkeit der Sacramente Nach Hugo V. St. Victor. The New Scholasticism 7 (2):183-184.
Víctor M. Sánchez-Valencia (2001). Borges, Hugo Margáin y El Estudio de Los Cuantificadores Generalizados. Crítica 33 (99):111 - 112.
J. L. M. Elders (ed.) (1984). Hugo Grotius, 1583-1983: Maastricht Hugo Grotius Colloquium, March 31, 1983. Van Gorcum.
Joseph Horovitz (1986). A Criticism of Shmuel Hugo Bergman's Account of Nicolaus Cusanus. In Abraham Zvie Bar-On (ed.), On Shmuel Hugo Bergman's Philosophy. Distributed in the U.S.A. By Humanities Press.
Ana Nettel & Georges Roque (2012). Persuasive Argumentation Versus Manipulation. Argumentation 26 (1):55-69.
Hugo Bergmann & Franz Brentano (1946). Briefe Franz Brentanos an Hugo Bergmann. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 7 (1):83-158.
Added to index2011-09-28
Total downloads6 ( #154,793 of 739,318 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?