Programs, language understanding, and Searle
Synthese 59 (May):219-30 (1984)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Artificial Intelligence Language Program Understanding Searle, J | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesKarl Pfeifer (1992). Searle, Strong AI, and Two Ways of Sorting Cucumbers. Journal of Philosophical Research 17:347-50.
John R. Searle (1980). Minds, Brains and Programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3:417-57.
Victor Rodych (2003). Searle Freed of Every Flaw. Acta Analytica 18 (30-31):161-175.
Georges Rey (2003). Searle's Misunderstandings of Functionalism and Strong AI. In John M. Preston & Michael A. Bishop (eds.), Views Into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press.
Richard Sharvy (1983). I. It Ain't the Meat, It's the Motion. Inquiry 26 (1):125 – 131.
Andrew Melnyk (1996). Searle's Abstract Argument Against Strong AI. Synthese 108 (3):391-419.
William J. Rapaport (1993). Because Mere Calculating Isn't Thinking: Comments on Hauser's Why Isn't My Pocket Calculator a Thinking Thing?. Minds and Machines 3 (1):11-20.
Ned Block (2003). Searle's Arguments Against Cognitive Science. In John M. Preston & Michael A. Bishop (eds.), Views Into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press.
L.-M. Russow (1984). Unlocking the Chinese Room. Nature and System 6 (December):221-8.
William J. Rapaport (1988). Syntactic Semantics: Foundations of Computational Natural Language Understanding. In James H. Fetzer (ed.), Aspects of AI. Kluwer.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads8 ( #122,991 of 549,010 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,010 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
