Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.
- Peter Carruthers (2003). Review of Gregory Currie, Ian Ravenscroft, Recreative Minds: Imagination in Philosophy and Psychology. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2003 (11).
Similar books and articles
What’s Darwin got to do with it? The role of evolutionary theory in psychiatry Content Type Journal Article Category Review Essay Pages 1-12 DOI 10.1007/s10539-011-9301-3 Authors Ian Ravenscroft, Philosophy Department, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia Journal Biology and Philosophy Online ISSN 1572-8404 Print ISSN 0169-3867.
What kinds of psychological states motivate us? Beliefs and desires are the obvious candidates. But some aspects of our behaviour suggest another idea. I have in mind the view that imagination can sometimes constitute motivation.
No categories
Recreative Minds develops a philosophical theory of imagination that draws upon the latest work in psychology. This theory illuminates the use of imagination in coming to terms with art, its role in enabling us to live as social beings, and the psychological consequences of disordered imagination. The authors offer a lucid exploration of a fascinating subject.
Discussion of Peter Carruthers, Review of Gregory Currie, Ian Ravenscroft, _Recreative Minds: Imagination in Philosophy and Psychology_
|
|
There are no threads in this forum |
Nothing in this forum yet.

