Mind 114 (456):915-927 (2005)
|Abstract||Peter Geach has said that Russell's use of ‘propositional function’ is ‘hopelessly confused and inconsistent’. Geach is right, and attempts to say what exactly a Russellian propositional function is, or is supposed to be, are bound to end in frustration. Nevertheless, it may be worthwhile to pursue an account of propositional functions that accommodates a good deal of what Russell says about them and that can provide some of what he expected of them.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Pavel Naumov (2005). On Modal Logics of Partial Recursive Functions. Studia Logica 81 (3):295 - 309.
Kevin C. Klement (forthcoming). PM's Circumflex, Syntax and Philosophy of Types. In Bernard Linsky & Nicholas Griffin (eds.), Principia Mathematica at 100. Cambridge.
Stanisław Jaśkowski (1975). Three Contributions to the Two-Valued Propositional Calculus. Studia Logica 34 (1):121 - 132.
Alexander Paul Bozzo (2011). Functions or Propositional Functions? [REVIEW] Russell 30 (2):161-8.
Peter Roeper & Hugues Leblanc (1999). Absolute Probability Functions for Intuitionistic Propositional Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (3):223-234.
Kevin C. Klement (2004). Putting Form Before Function: Logical Grammar in Frege, Russell, and Wittgenstein. Philosophers' Imprint 4 (2):1-47.
George Bealer (1989). On the Identification of Properties and Propositional Functions. Linguistics and Philosophy 12 (1):1 - 14.
Kevin C. Klement (2010). The Functions of Russell's No Class Theory. Review of Symbolic Logic 3 (4):633-664.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads46 ( #28,106 of 722,813 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,982 of 722,813 )
How can I increase my downloads?