David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Critical Realism 9 (3):384-396 (2010)
The theoretical work on individualization undertaken by Zygmunt Bauman, Ulrich Beck and Anthony Giddens has possessed an enduring influence within sociology. The New Individualism is a recent formulation of this older body of work. In this review essay I critically assess the book from the perspective of the recent work of Margaret Archer. I argue that while much of it is plagued by methodological and empirical inadequacies there are questioned posed by it, as well as by the individualization literature more widely, which are worthy of recovery. I suggest that critical realism in general, as well as Archer’s work in particular, are uniquely placed to perform this act of recovery
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Margaret Scotford Archer (2000). Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
S. Kemp (2012). Interests and Structure in Dualist Social Theory: A Critical Appraisal of Archer's Theoretical and Empirical Arguments. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (4):489-510.
Charles Harvey (2006). Reflective and Reflexive Selfhood. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 13 (1):13-19.
Esther Loon & Teun Zuiderent-Jerak (2012). Framing Reflexivity in Quality Improvement Devices in the Care for Older People. Health Care Analysis 20 (2):119-138.
Richard W. Miller (1978). Methodological Individualism and Social Explanation. Philosophy of Science 45 (3):387-414.
Andrew Sayer (2009). Making Our Way Through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility by Margaret S. Archer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. 352 Pp. 978-0521696937 Paperback, £18.99. [REVIEW] Journal of Critical Realism 8 (1):113-123.
Michael Hymers (1997). Realism and Self-Knowledge: A Problem for Burge. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 86 (3):303-325.
G. B. Madison (1990). How Individualistic is Methodological Individualism? Critical Review 4 (1-2):41-60.
Margaret S. Archer (2010). Critical Realism and Relational Sociology: Complementarity and Synergy. Journal of Critical Realism 9 (2):199-207.
Mark Olssen (1996). Radical Constructivism and Its Failings: Anti-Realism and Individualism. British Journal of Educational Studies 44 (3):275 - 295.
Anthony Elliott, Masataka Katagiri & Atsushi Sawai (2012). The New Individualism and Contemporary Japan: Theoretical Avenues and the Japanese New Individualist Path. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 42 (4):425-443.
Margaret S. Archer (2007). Realism and the Problem of Agency. Journal of Critical Realism 5 (1).
Cga Bryant, George Soros's Theory of Reflexivity: A Comparison with the Theories of Giddens and Beck and a Consideration of its Practical Value.
John B. Davis & Matthias Klaes (2003). Reflexivity: Curse or Cure? Journal of Economic Methodology 10 (3):329-352.
Margaret Archer, Rachel Sharp, Rob Stones & Tony Woodiwiss (2007). Critical Realism and Research Methodology. Journal of Critical Realism 2 (1).
Added to index2010-11-04
Total downloads18 ( #93,241 of 1,101,689 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #292,019 of 1,101,689 )
How can I increase my downloads?