Religious Studies 35 (4):425-439 (1999)
|Abstract||One of Śaṅkara's most fundamental claims is that nirguṇa brahman, 'unqualified reality', is the origin of the world of experience. A serious challenge is posed by the Sāṅkhyan philosophers in terms of a principle of material causation, that the properties manifested in the effect are inherited from the material cause. Since nirguṇa brahman and the experienced world are so different, the principle implies that the former cannot be the material cause of the latter. Versions of the principle in relation to alternative kinds of candidates for the role of material cause are discussed, considering the particular cases which motivate both Śaṅkara's and the Sāṅkhyans' metaphysics alike. Śaṅkara seems forced to accept an implausible version of the principle by his own analysis of material causation|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Lei Zhong (2011). Can Counterfactuals Solve the Exclusion Problem? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (1):129-147.
Knut A. Jacobsen (2007). The Meaning of Prakti in the Yogastra and Vyāsabhāya. Asian Philosophy 17 (1):1 – 16.
David Barnett (2005). The Problem of Material Origins. Noûs 39 (3):529–540.
Theodore Sider (2000). Simply Possible. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (3):585-590.
Guy Rohrbaugh & Louis deRosset (2004). A New Route to the Necessity of Origin. Mind 113 (452):705-725.
Catherine Jack Deavel (2009). Thomas Aquinas and Knowledge of Material Objects. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:269-278.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?