David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoria 49 (3):142-158 (1983)
provide a plausible alternative to utilitarianism. Rawls gives two kinds of arguments to show that his two principles of justice are more plausible or more nearly correct than utilitarianism. First, he argues that the two principles of justice provide a better match with our 'considered judgments in reflective equilibrium.' Second, he argues that his two principles would be chosen in preference to the principle of utility in 'the original position.' I shall be concerned only with the second of these two arguments in this paper. According to Rawls, people in the original position choose principles on the assumption that whatever principles are chosen will be strictly complied with, i.e., they choose on the assumption that the basic institutions of their society and all of the actions of its members will be in compliance with whatever principles are chosen
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Brian M. Barry (1973). The Liberal Theory of Justice. Oxford,Clarendon Press.
Jeremy Bentham (1988). The Principles of Morals and Legislation. Prometheus Books.
Richard B. Brandt (1998). A Theory of the Good and the Right. Prometheus Books.
John Rawls (1971/2005). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
Rolf E. Sartorius (1975). Individual Conduct and Social Norms: A Utilitarian Account of Social Union and the Rule of Law. Dickenson Pub. Co..
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jon Mandle (2013). The Place of Rawls in Political and Ethical Theory. Metaphilosophy 44 (1-2):37-41.
Philip Pettit (1974). A Theory of Justice? Theory and Decision 4 (3-4):311-324.
Ivar Labukt (2009). Rawls on the Practicability of Utilitarianism. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (2):201-221.
Hun Chung (2008). Can Classical Utilitarianism Participate in Overlapping Consensus? Why Not? Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:53-60.
Larry A. Alexander (1985). Fair Equality of Opportunity. Philosophy Research Archives 11:197-208.
Michael S. Pritchard & Wade L. Robison (1981). Justice and the Treatment of Animals: A Critique of Rawls. Environmental Ethics 3 (1):55-61.
Duncan MacIntosh (1990). Ideal Moral Codes. Southern Journal of Philosophy 28 (3):389-408.
Andrew Williams (2008). Justice, Incentives and Constructivism. Ratio 21 (4):476-493.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads15 ( #102,336 of 1,096,454 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #34,641 of 1,096,454 )
How can I increase my downloads?