Should damage to the machinery for social perception damage perception

Cognitive Neuroscience 2 (2):116-17 (2011)
Abstract
We argue that Graziano and Kastner are mistaken to claim that neglect favors their self-directed social perception account of consciousness. For the latter should not predict that neglect would result from damage to mechanisms of social perception. Neglect is better explained in terms of damage to attentional mechanisms.
Keywords social neuroscience  perception  phenomenal consciousness  perceptual model of consciousness
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Peter Carruthers, Should damage to the machinery for social perception damage perception
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Anna Berti (2002). Unconscious Processing in Neglect. In Hans-Otto Karnath, David Milner & Giuseppe Vallar (eds.), The Cognitive and Neural Bases of Spatial Neglect. Oxford University Press. 313-326.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-06-26

Total downloads

69 ( #20,157 of 1,098,628 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

14 ( #11,590 of 1,098,628 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.