Should Repugnance Give Us Pause? On the Neuroscience of Daily Moral Reasoning

American Journal of Bioethics- Neuroscience 2 (2):47-48 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In our commentary we briefly review the work on the neurological differences between the rational ethical analysis used in professional contexts and the reflexive emotional responses of our daily moral reasoning, and discuss the implications for the claim that our normative arguments should not rely on the emotion of repugnance.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral reasoning.Gilbert Harman, Kelby Mason & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2010 - In John M. Doris (ed.), Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Studying Moral Reasoning in Business Settings.Elaine McGivern & James Weber - 2006 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:18-23.
Moral Reasoning: Hints and Allegations.Joseph M. Paxton & Joshua D. Greene - 2010 - Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (3):511-527.
What good is moral reasoning?Hugo Mercier - 2011 - Mind and Society 10 (2):131-148.
Computation, coherence, and ethical reasoning.Marcello Guarini - 2007 - Minds and Machines 17 (1):27-46.
Moral intuitions, moral expertise and moral reasoning.Albert W. Musschenga - 2009 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (4):597-613.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-07-23

Downloads
36 (#421,132)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jennifer Swindell Blumenthal-Barby
Baylor College of Medicine

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references