Should Repugnance Give Us Pause? On the Neuroscience of Daily Moral Reasoning

In our commentary we briefly review the work on the neurological differences between the rational ethical analysis used in professional contexts and the reflexive emotional responses of our daily moral reasoning, and discuss the implications for the claim that our normative arguments should not rely on the emotion of repugnance.
Keywords neuroethics  moral reasoning
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,865
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Elaine McGivern & James Weber (2006). Studying Moral Reasoning in Business Settings. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:18-23.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

10 ( #227,665 of 1,724,902 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #349,164 of 1,724,902 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.