David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (2):304-304 (1997)
Recent accounts of the speed/accuracy relation for motor tasks have focused on the concept of motor output variability. We outline the advantages of this approach and the limitation of Plamondon's model in explaining movement error. We also examine and present complimentary data for rapid timing tasks. While these tasks do not meet the presented assumptions, the data still fit the model predictions
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Luca A. Finelli & Terrence J. Sejnowski (2005). What is Consolidated During Sleep-Dependent Motor Skill Learning? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):70-71.
David E. Sherwood (1997). Speed/Accuracy Trade-Offs in Rapid Simultaneous and Sequential Actions: Evidence for Carryover Effects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (2):320-320.
Michael Kruse (1997). Variation and the Accuracy of Predictions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (2):181-193.
Nelson Cowan (1998). What is More Explanatory, Processing Capacity or Processing Speed? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):835-836.
Roger C. Buck (1963). Reflexive Predictions. Philosophy of Science 30 (4):359-369.
Kathi Fisler (1999). Timing Diagrams: Formalization and Algorithmic Verification. [REVIEW] Journal of Logic, Language and Information 8 (3):323-361.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?