Graduate studies at Western
Biology and Philosophy 19 (5):739-764 (2004)
|Abstract||No evidence exists that the accidental origin of life is too improbable to have occurred naturally, but there are numerous attempts to argue so. Dizzying statistics are cited to show that a god had to be responsible. This paper identifies the Argument from Biogenesis, then explains why all these arguments so far fail, and what would actually have to be done to make such an argument succeed. Describes seven general types of error, with examples. Includes a table of forty-seven statistics used by over twenty authors to date.|
|Keywords||biochemistry biogenesis god life naturalism origin probability statistics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Timothy McGrew, Lydia McGrew & and Eric Vestrup (2001). Probabilities and the Fine-Tuning Argument: A Sceptical View. Mind 110 (440):1027-1038.
T. Robertson (1998). Possibilities and the Arguments for Origin Essentialism. Mind 107 (428):729-750.
R. Hengeveld (2007). Two Approaches to the Study of the Origin of Life. Acta Biotheoretica 55 (2).
Jeremy Gwiazda (2010). Richard Swinburne, the Existence of God, and Exact Numerical Values. Philosophia 38 (2):357-363.
Sonia Roca-Royes & Ross Cameron (2006). Rohrbaugh and deRosset on the Necessity of Origin. Mind 115 (458):361-366.
Ross Cameron (2005). A Note on Kripke's Footnote 56 Argument for the Essentiality of Origin. Ratio 18 (3):262-275.
Gerard Jagers op Akkerhuis (2011). Explaining the Origin of Life is Not Enough for a Definition of Life. Foundations of Science 16 (4):327-329.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #62,947 of 751,960 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,163 of 751,960 )
How can I increase my downloads?