Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):515-516 (1998)
|Abstract||The frame/content theory suggests that chewing was tinkered into speaking. A simple extrapolation of this approach suggests that syllable structure may have been tinkered into syntax. That would explain the widely noted parallels between sentence structure and syllable structure, and also the otherwise mysterious pervasiveness of the grammatical distinction between sentences and noun phrases|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Holly P. Branigan & Martin J. Pickering (2004). Syntactic Representation in the Lemma Stratum. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):296-297.
Jeffrey A. Barrett (2009). The Evolution of Coding in Signaling Games. Theory and Decision 67 (2):223-237.
Peter F. MacNeilage (1998). The Frame/Content Theory of Evolution of Speech Production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):499-511.
M. F. Egan (1989). What's Wrong with the Syntactic Theory of Mind. Philosophy of Science 56 (December):664-74.
Cynthia A. Thompson, Roger Levy & Christopher D. Manning, A Generative Model for Semantic Role Labeling.
Derek Bickerton (2003). Language Evolution Without Evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):669-670.
Irene M. Pepperberg (1998). Out of the Mouths of Babes . . . And Beaks of Birds? A Broader Interpretation of the Frame/Content Theory for the Evolution of Speech Production. [REVIEW] Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):526-527.
Trevor A. Harley (1998). Content Without a Frame? The Role of Vocabulary Biases in Speech Errors. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):518-519.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #290,877 of 722,698 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?