The Ontological Argument and the Sin of Hubris
Philosophy Now 53:24-27 (2005)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesValérie Petit & Helen Bollaert (2012). Flying Too Close to the Sun? Hubris Among CEOs and How to Prevent It. Journal of Business Ethics 108 (3):265-283.
Thomas Williams, Saint Anselm. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Graham Oppy (2008). The Ontological Argument. In Paul Copan & Chad V. Meister (eds.), Philosophy of Religion: Classic and Contemporary Issues. Blackwell Pub..
Yujin Nagasawa (2010). The Ontological Argument and the Devil. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):72-91.
Elijah Millgram (2004). The Ontological Meta-Argument. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 4 (3):331-334.
Rik Peels (2011). Sin and Human Cognition of God. Scottish Journal of Theology 64 (4):390-409.
Thomas Metcalf (2005). Entailment and Ontological Arguments. Philo 8 (2):131-133.
Yujin Nagasawa (2007). Millican on the Ontological Argument. Mind 116 (464):1027 - 1039.
Chris Heathwood (2011). The Relevance of Kant's Objection to Anselm's Ontological Argument. Religious Studies 47:345–57.
Elliott Sober (2004). The Design Argument. In William Mann (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell Pub..
Michael Papazian (2007). The Ontological Argument of Diogenes of Babylon. Phronesis 52 (2):188-209.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2011-12-02Total downloads1 ( #277,212 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
