The unity of science

International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (1):17-31 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper addresses the question of how the unity of science can adequately be characterized. A mere classification of scientific fields and disciplines does not express the unity of science unless it is supplemented with a perspective that establishes a systematic coherence among the different branches of science. Four ideas of this kind are discussed. Namely, the unity of scientific language, of scientific laws, of scientific method and of science as a practical‐operational enterprise. Whereas reference to the unity of scientific language and of scientific laws does not provide a viable basis for the unity of science, the methodological and practical unity might. The unity of science can be characterized by the way in which methodological criteria enter into the assessment or evaluation of theories, and, moreover, by a transdisciplin‐ary approach to problems. Accordingly, the unity of science is not expressed by theoretical uniformity but by the unity of scientific practice.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-01

Downloads
96 (#164,544)

6 months
1 (#1,028,709)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Martin Carrier
Bielefeld University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

From a logical point of view.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1953 - Cambridge,: Harvard University Press.
Readings in the philosophy of science.Herbert Feigl - 1953 - New York,: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Edited by May Brodbeck.

View all 12 references / Add more references