Oxford University Press (2003)
|Abstract||The major divide in contemporary epistemology is between those who embrace and those who reject a priori knowledge. Albert Casullo provides a systematic treatment of the primary epistemological issues associated with the controversy. By freeing the a priori from traditional assumptions about the nature of knowledge and justification, he offers a novel approach to resolving these issues which assigns a prominent role to empirical evidence. He concludes by arguing that traditional approaches to the a priori, which focus primarily on the concepts of necessity and analyticity, are misguided.|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$28.50 used (75% off) $37.95 new (66% off) $75.99 direct from Amazon (31% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||BD181.3.C38 2003|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Joshua Thurow (2006). Experientially Defeasible a Priori Justification. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (225):596–602.
Joel Pust (2005). A Priori Justification. [REVIEW] Mind 114 (453):124-128.
Joachim Horvath (2009). The Modal Argument for a Priori Justification. Ratio 22 (2):191-205.
Mikael Janvid (2008). The Experiential Defeasibility and Overdetermination of A Priori Justification. Journal of Philosophical Research 33:271-278.
John Turri (2011). Contingent A Priori Knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (2):327-344.
Pat Manfredi (2000). The Compatibility of a Priori Knowledge and Empirical Defeasibility: A Defense of a Modest a Priori. Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 (S1):179-189.
Tuomas E. Tahko (2011). A Priori and A Posteriori: A Bootstrapping Relationship. [REVIEW] Metaphysica 12 (2):151-164.
Albert Casullo (2009). Analyzing a Priori Knowledge. Philosophical Studies 142 (1):77 - 90.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads82 ( #11,409 of 722,700 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,273 of 722,700 )
How can I increase my downloads?