Graduate studies at Western
Teaching Philosophy 30 (3):293-308 (2007)
|Abstract||This article urges teachers of philosophy to “remember Meno’s slave boy.” In Plato’s Meno, Socrates famously uses a stick to draw figures in the dust, andMeno’s uneducated slave boy (with some prompting by Socrates) grasps geometry. Plato uses this interaction to show that all learning is, in fact, recollection. Regardless of the merits of that position, Socrates’ conversation with the slave boy is an excellent demonstration that understanding is aided by appealing to the different talents or “intelligences” of students. Similarly, I advocate using stories and hand-drawn stick figure cartoons to teach philosophy|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Marthe Chandler (2003). "Meno" and "Mencius:" Two Philosophical Dramas. Philosophy East and West 53 (3):367-398.
John White (2008). Illusory Intelligences? Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (3-4):611-630.
Hugh H. Benson (1990). Meno, the Slave Boy and the Elenchos. Phronesis 35 (1):128-158.
Roslyn Weiss (2001). Virtue in the Cave: Moral Inquiry in Plato's Meno. Oxford University Press.
Cristina Ionescu (2006). The Mythical Introduction of Recollection in the Meno (81A5–E2). Journal of Philosophical Research 31:153-170.
Harold Weiss (2009). Teaching and Learning About Suicide. Teaching Philosophy 32 (1):41-51.
Doug Blomberg (2010). Multiple Intelligences, Judgment, and Realization of Value. Ethics and Education 4 (2):163-175.
Lee Franklin (2009). Meno's Paradox, the Slave-Boy Interrogation, and the Unity of Platonic Recollection. Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (4):349-377.
Mike Fleetham (2006). Multiple Intelligences in Practice: Enhancing Self-Esteem and Learning in the Classroom. Network Continuum Education.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #189,051 of 739,304 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,304 )
How can I increase my downloads?