Business ethics: Some observations on the relationship between training, affiliation, and disciplinary drift [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 14 (9):781 - 786 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper undertakes an inquiry into the relationship between the disciplinary training of business ethicists, their institutional affiliations, those whose work they cite, those with whom they collaborate, and — to some degree — the kind of work they do. It is intended as a response to both the historic injunction that we examine ourselves and to what is seen as the considerable disarray of the field.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
30 (#521,181)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Corporate Roles, Personal Virtues.Robert C. Solomon - 1992 - Business Ethics Quarterly 2 (3):317-339.
Corporate Roles, Personal Virtues.Robert C. Solomon - 1992 - Business Ethics Quarterly 2 (3):317-339.
The status of business ethics: past and future.Richard T. De George - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (3):201-211.
The Empirical Quest for Normative Meaning.William C. Frederick - 1992 - Business Ethics Quarterly 2 (2):91-98.

View all 11 references / Add more references