Epiphenomenalisms, ancient and modern

Philosophical Review 106 (3):309-363 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This debate, I shall argue, has everything to do with Aristotle. Aristotle raises the charge of epiphenomenalism himself against a theory that seems to have close affinities to his own, and he offers what has the makings of an emergentist response. This leads to controversy within his own school. We find opponents ranged on both sides, starting with his own pupils, several of whom are stout defenders of epiphenomenalism, and culminating in the developed emergentism of later commentators. Aristotle’s theory and the debate that ensued are thus quite relevant to contemporary discussions. But first we need to get clear on terms.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
200 (#96,881)

6 months
15 (#159,128)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Victor Caston
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Citations of this work

Emergent Properties.Hong Yu Wong - 2015 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Mental Causation.David Robb & John Heil - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Causation and mental causation.Jaegwon Kim - 2007 - In Brian P. McLaughlin & Jonathan D. Cohen (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Mind. Blackwell. pp. 227--242.
Epiphenomenalism.William Robinson - 2003 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 39 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references