David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Metaphilosophy 43 (5):619-635 (2012)
Historically, philosophers have identified happiness with, among other things, pleasure, contentment, desire satisfaction, and, if we count the Greek eudaimonia as happiness, the life of virtue. When faced with competing theories of happiness, we need a way to decide which theory is more accurate. According to Larry Wayne Sumner's principle of descriptive adequacy, the best theory of happiness is the theory that best describes our ordinary, pretheoretical beliefs and intuitions. The chief aim of this article is to show that the principle of descriptive adequacy is mistaken. To do this, it shows how the principle breaks down when applied to Aristotle's theory of eudaimonia, a theory Sumner claims to be descriptively inadequate as a theory of happiness. The article argues that we should reject descriptive adequacy as a metaphilosophical principle on the grounds that our intuitions and beliefs about happiness are too inchoate for any theory adequately to describe
|Keywords||Aristotle eudaimonia happiness Larry Wayne Sumner descriptive adequacy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
L. W. Sumner (1996). Welfare, Happiness, and Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Daniel M. Haybron (2008). The Pursuit of Unhappiness: The Elusive Psychology of Well-Being. OUP Oxford.
Julia Annas (1993). The Morality of Happiness. Oxford University Press.
Daniel M. Haybron (2001). Happiness and Pleasure. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (3):501-528.
John M. Cooper (1975). Reason and Human Good in Aristotle. Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Stephen M. Fishman & Lucille Mccarthy (2013). Conflicting Uses of 'Happiness' and the Human Condition. Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (5):509-515.
Robert Heinaman (1993). Rationality, Eudaimonia and Kakodaimonia in Aristotle. Phronesis 38 (1):31 - 56.
David Shaw (2009). Euthanasia and Eudaimonia. Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (9):530-533.
Fred Feldman (2010). What is This Thing Called Happiness? Oxford University Press.
J. C. Dybikowski (1981). Is Aristotelian Eudaimonia Happiness? Dialogue 20 (2):185-200.
Harry Brighouse & Adam Swift (2009). Educational Equality Versus Educational Adequacy: A Critique of Anderson and Satz. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (2):117-128.
Daniel M. Haybron (2003). What Do We Want From a Theory of Happiness? Metaphilosophy 34 (3):305-329.
Alan S. Waterman (1990). The Relevance of Aristotle's Conception of Eudaimonia for the Psychological Study of Happiness. Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 10 (1):39-44.
Fred Wilson (1982). Mill's Proof That Happiness is the Criterion of Morality. Journal of Business Ethics 1 (1):59 - 72.
Otfried Höffe (2010). Can Virtue Make Us Happy?: The Art of Living and Morality. Northwestern University Press.
Valerie Tiberius & Michelle Mason (2009). Eudaimonia. In Shane J. Lopez (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Positive Psychology. Wiley-Blackwell 1--351.
Dan Haybron (forthcoming). Happiness. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Gary Watson (1983). Kant on Happiness in the Moral Life. Philosophy Research Archives 9:79-108.
Added to index2012-10-06
Total downloads22 ( #170,633 of 1,796,192 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #349,835 of 1,796,192 )
How can I increase my downloads?