La hipótesis del cuanto de luz y la relatividad especial¿ Por qué Einstein no las relacionó en 1905?

Scientiae Studia 5 (4):425-452 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Role of the Michelson–Morley Experiment: Einstein in Chicago.Jeroen van Dongen - 2009 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 63 (6):655-663.
Horizontes abiertos por las Teorías de la Relatividad de Einstein.F. González de Posada - 2005 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 24 (2):83-90.
¿ Qué es la teoría de la relatividad?Albert Einstein - 2005 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 24 (1):3101-105.
Planck, Einstein y el nacimiento de la teoría cuántica (1900-1905).Alejandro Mayorga - 2002 - Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica 40 (100):145-154.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-15

Downloads
12 (#1,054,764)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The inference to the best explanation.Gilbert H. Harman - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):88-95.
Explanatory unification and the causal structure of the world.Philip Kitcher - 1989 - In Philip Kitcher & Wesley Salmon (eds.), Scientific Explanation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 410-505.
Patterns of Discovery.Antony Flew - 1961 - Philosophical Quarterly 11 (43):189-190.
Einstein's introduction of photons: Argument by analogy or deduction from the phenomena?Jon Dorling - 1971 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 22 (1):1-8.
The Generalized Theory of Gravitation.[author unknown] - 1950 - New Scholasticism 24 (2):113-114.

View all 7 references / Add more references