David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Acta Biotheoretica 28 (1) (1979)
Within many animal taxa there is a trend for the species of larger body size to eat food of lower caloric value. For example, most large extant lizards are herbivorous. Reasonable arguments based on energetic considerations are often invoked to explain this trend, yet, while these factors set limits to feasible body size, they do not in themselves mathematically produce optimum body sizes. A simple optimization model is developed here which considers food search, capture, and eating rates and the metabolic cost of these activities for animals of different sizes. The optimization criterion is defined as the net caloric gain a consumer accrues per day. This model does produce an optimum intermediate body size which increases with food quality - not the reverse. This discrepancy is accounted for, however, because the model also predicts that body size should be even more sensitive to increases in food abundance. In nature, many poor quality foods are also relatively abundant foods, hence the consumers eating them may maximize their daily energetic profit by evolving a relatively large body size. Optimum consumer body size also decreases with increases in consumer metabolic rate and prey speed.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Daniel Garber (2004). Leibniz on Body, Matter and Extension. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 78 (1):23–40.
D. H. Spaargaren (1983). Some Aspects of Element Turnover in Living Organisms. Acta Biotheoretica 32 (1).
Charles S. Cockell (2008). Environmental Ethics and Size. Ethics and the Environment 13 (1):pp. 23-39.
Helena De Preester & Manos Tsakiris (2009). Body-Extension Versus Body-Incorporation: Is There a Need for a Body-Model? [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8 (3):307-319.
Helen E. Ross (2003). Neurological Models of Size Scaling. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):425-425.
Khaled Elsayed (2006). Reexamining the Expected Effect of Available Resources and Firm Size on Firm Environmental Orientation: An Empirical Study of UK Firms. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 65 (3):297 - 308.
David J. Bennett (2011). How the World Is Measured Up in Size Experience. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (2):345-365.
Cor van der Weele (2006). “Food Metaphors and Ethics: Towards More Attention for Bodily Experience”. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (3):313-324.
D. H. Spaargaren (1994). Metabolic Rate and Body Size. Acta Biotheoretica 42 (4).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #237,662 of 1,101,944 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #306,569 of 1,101,944 )
How can I increase my downloads?