Protagoras refuted: How clever is socrates' "most clever" argument at theaetetus 171a–c?'
Topoi 23 (1):3-32 (2004)
| Abstract | This article aims at reconstructing the logic and assessing the force of Socrates' argument against Protagoras' 'Measure Doctrine' (MD) at Theaetetus 171a–c. I examine and criticise some influential interpretations of the passage, according to which, e.g., Socrates is guilty of ignoratio elenchi by dropping the essential Protagorean qualifiers or successfully proves that md is self-refuting provided the missing qualifiers are restored by the attentive reader. Having clarified the meaning of MD, I analyse in detail the broader section 170a–171d and argue, against an extensive scholarly consensus, (1) that it contains two slightly different formulations of the same argument, and not two (or three) distinct arguments, (2) that Socrates does not highlight his own strategy at 171a–c as especially clever, and (3) that his argument successfully shows that md turns out to be untenable for Protagoras himself when submitted to scrutiny in dialectical contexts, without aiming at proving its absolute falsehood. Finally, I clarify the philosophical import of the final image of Protagoras' momentary return from the underworld. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRaphael Woolf (2002). Consistency and Akrasia in Plato's Protagoras. Phronesis 47 (3):224-252.
Nicholas Denyer (ed.) (2008). Plato: Protagoras. Cambridge University Press.
Tea Logar (2010). “Diagnostic Hedonism” and the Role of Incommensurability in Plato's Protagoras. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):241-257.
T. D. J. Chappell (2006). Reading The_ Περιτρoπη: Theaetetus _170c-171c. Phronesis 51 (2):109-139.
Avi I. Mintz (2011). Four Educators in Plato's Theaetetus. Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (4):657-673.
Alex Long (2004). Refutation and Relativism in Theaetetus 161-171. Phronesis 49 (1):24-40.
Marina Berzins McCoy (2005). Reason and Dialectic in the Argument Against Protagoras in the Theaetetus. International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (1):21-39.
A. Long (2004). Refutation and Relativism in Theaetetus 161-171. Phronesis 49 (1):24-40.
Mary Bloodsworth (1999). The Implications of Consistency. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 6 (3/4):15-20.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads44 ( #25,394 of 550,854 )Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #10,483 of 550,854 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
