Reply to Professor Anderson

Before I come to Professor Anderson’s objections to the argument in question, I should like to clarify just a few points. The argument that I presented is taken immediately from Mortimer Adler’s presentation of it, so let us call it ‘Adler’s Argument,’ though in fact its origins go all the way back to Aristotle. My reading of Adler’s presentation of the argument was that he gave it in two different forms, one categorical, the other hypothetical. Both forms of the argument, of course, have effectively the same conclusion, which is, in the case of its categorical version, that “concepts are not physical beings” [proposition 3 for Professor Anderson] and, in the case of its hypothetical version, that “A concept is not an act of a bodily organ” [proposition 6 for Professor Anderson]. Now Adler concludes immediately from propositions 3/6 that “the power of conceptual thought is an immaterial power.” I argued in my original article that it was not obvious that this proposition was equivalent to propositions 3/6 and so I presented an additional argument to the bridge the gap [propositions a, b, c and d for Professor Anderson]. Let us call this ‘Casey’s Addendum.’.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/acpq199569419
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Thomas Anderson (1995). Reply to Professor Gerard Casey. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 69 (4):619-620.
James F. Anderson (1949). Remarks on Professor Cunningham's "Reply". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 10 (2):262.
J. G. C. Anderson (1919). Professor F. Haverfield. The Classical Review 33 (7-8):165-166.
W. T. H. (1877). Professor Anderson's Translation of the Edda. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 11 (1):109 -.
Alan Ross Anderson (1962). On Professor Martin's Beliefs. Journal of Philosophy 59 (21):600-607.
Gilbert Ryle (1950). Logic and Professor Anderson. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 28 (3):137 – 153.
W. A. Merrylees (1929). Some Features of Professor Anderson's Logic. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 7 (2):130 – 138.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

24 ( #124,740 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

11 ( #61,095 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.