International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (3):223 – 243 (2005)
|Abstract||The aim of this paper is to analyze time-asymmetric quantum mechanics with respect to the problems of irreversibility and of time's arrow. We begin with arguing that both problems are conceptually different. Then, we show that, contrary to a common opinion, the theory's ability to describe irreversible quantum processes is not a consequence of the semigroup evolution laws expressing the non-time-reversal invariance of the theory. Finally, we argue that time-asymmetric quantum mechanics, either in Prigogine's version or in Bohm's version, does not solve the problem of the arrow of time because it does not supply a substantial and theoretically founded criterion for distinguishing between the two directions of time.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Meir Hemmo (2003). Remarks on the Direction of Time in Quantum Mechanics. Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1458-1471.
David Atkinson (2006). Does Quantum Electrodynamics Have an Arrow of Time?☆. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 37 (3):528-541.
Jos Uffink (2001). Bluff Your Way in the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 32 (3):305-394.
Étienne Klein (2007). About the Confusion Between the Course of Time and the Arrow of Time. Foundations of Science 12 (3).
Vassilios Karakostas (1996). On the Brussels School's Arrow of Time in Quantum Theory. Philosophy of Science 63 (3):374-400.
Chuang Liu (1993). The Arrow of Time in Quantum Gravity. Philosophy of Science 60 (4):619-637.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads29 ( #42,362 of 549,069 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,252 of 549,069 )
How can I increase my downloads?