Episteme 4 (3):322-334 (2007)
|Abstract||Tyler Burge offers a theory of testimony that allows for the possibility of both testimonial a priori warrant and testimonial a priori knowledge. I uncover a tension in his account of the relationship between the two, and locate its source in the analogy that Burge draws between testimonial warrant and preservative memory. I contend that this analogy should be rejected, and offer a revision of Burge's theory that eliminates the tension. I conclude by assessing the impact of the revised theory on the scope of a priori knowledge|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Charlie Pelling (2013). Testimony, Testimonial Belief, and Safety. Philosophical Studies 164 (1):205-217.
Albert Casullo (2003). A Priori Justification. Oxford University Press.
Tuomas E. Tahko (2011). A Priori and A Posteriori: A Bootstrapping Relationship. Metaphysica 12 (2):151-164.
Paul Faulkner (1998). Conspiracies And Lyes: Scepticism And The Epistemology of Testimony. Dissertation, University College London
Paul Faulkner (2011). Knowledge on Trust. OUP Oxford.
Tuomas E. Tahko (2008). A New Definition of A Priori Knowledge: In Search of a Modal Basis. Metaphysica 9 (2):57-68.
Steffen Borge (2003). The Word of Others. Journal of Applied Logic 1 (1-2):107-118.
Joachim Horvath (2008). Testimony, Transmission, and Safety. Abstracta 4 (1):27-43.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads56 ( #17,784 of 549,041 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,703 of 549,041 )
How can I increase my downloads?