David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Analysis 71 (2):240-244 (2011)
Quel bon vent, quel joli vent, ma vie m’appelle, ma vie m’attend French folk song 1. Presentists and Growing Block theorists appeal to ‘powerful intuitions’ when they defend their respective conceptions of time . Eternalists are prepared to go some length towards ‘reconciling’ the view from nowhen with at least some of these intuitions, or try to explain them away . Unaided intuitions may in fact underdetermine any particular metaphysical choice. One set of intuitions about time seems to have been neglected, though, in spite of its power. These intuitions are the mirror image of those supporting the Growing Block theory , and they are modelled on a pre-reflective understanding of our own life. According to the intuitions, only the future and the present are real; the past isn’t. The present is the constantly eroding edge of the future, which thus shrinks incessantly. There is less and less future as the present proceeds. The obvious intuitive model of this view of time is our life; from which every day eats up a little bit. Smaller scale models are available in everyday life. As you are reading this text, you have less and less to read. You know it. You know that at some point you’ll finish, or stop, reading it. But a model is not enough to make a grand philosophical claim, and indeed the very existence of the model is the ground for a negative claim: a picture, it may be said, is holding you captive. The Future Shrinker has two tasks. The first is to show that the intuitive picture supporting the claim is robust and does not make implausible epistemological claims. The second task is to show that her theory is at least compatible with scientific lore, and at best a good way ….
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
John D. Norton (2015). The Burning Fuse Model of Unbecoming in Time. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 52:103-105.
Similar books and articles
Jerome M. Siegel (2005). The Incredible, Shrinking Sleep-Learning Connection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):82-83.
Julia Kristeva (2009). This Incredible Need to Believe. Columbia University Press.
Arnold Zuboff (1990). One Self: The Logic of Experience. Inquiry 33 (1):39-68.
Masao Abe (1995). Buddhism and Interfaith Dialogue: Part One of a Two-Volume Sequel to Zen and Western Thought. University of Hawaiʻi Press.
Christian Bay (1984). Limits to Liberty in a Shrinking World. Journal of Social Philosophy 15 (3):12-19.
Stephen P. Turner (2009). Shrinking Merton. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (3):481-489.
Christopher Hughes (1997). An Incredible Coincidence? Mind 106 (424):769-772.
William F. Ryan (1934). Incredible Carnegie. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 8 (4):664-667.
Donald D. Weiss (1974). An Incredible Utilitarianism. Journal of Value Inquiry 8 (4):308-312.
Ezio Di Nucci (2012). Knowing Future Contingents. Logos and Episteme 3 (1):43-50.
Matthias Kilian (2011). New Threads, Shrinking Lawyers and More: Correspondent's Report From Europe. Legal Ethics 14 (1):129-131.
Thomas D. Senor (2005). Trusting Lucy: Believing the Incredible. In Gregory Bassham & Jerry L. Walls (eds.), The Chronicles of Narnia and Philosophy. Open Court
Xiaoting Liu (2008). Future Idea and Philosophical Understanding. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 24:37-43.
Added to index2011-03-12
Total downloads102 ( #37,647 of 1,793,270 )
Recent downloads (6 months)17 ( #44,281 of 1,793,270 )
How can I increase my downloads?