David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Hypatia 28 (1):32-48 (2013)
This paper considers the bioethics of estranged biological kin, who are biologically related people not in contact with one another (due to adoption, abandonment, or other long-term estrangement). Specifically, I am interested in what is owed to estranged biological kin in the event of medical need. A survey of current bioethics demonstrates that most analyses are not prepared to reckon with the complications of having or being estranged biological kin. For example, adoptees might wonder if a lack of contact with biological kin could someday affect their medical care (or affect the medical care of their biological relatives). Estranged biological kin, such as adoptees, present us with a chance to think about human connection. After sketching several organ-donation and adoption tropes, I argue that a feminist analysis of vulnerability and dependency is helpful for understanding the confusing ties of estranged biological kin. I conclude by proposing a medical registry that would put adoptees and others in touch with their estranged biological kin on a medically as-needed basis
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Sara Ruddick (1989/1990). Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace. The Women's Press.
Margaret Urban Walker (1998). Moral Understandings: A Feminist Study In. In Stephen Everson (ed.), Ethics. Cambridge University Press
Patricia Hill Collins (1991/2008). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment. Routledge.
Amy Mullin (2012). Reconceiving Pregnancy and Childcare: Ethics, Experience, and Reproductive Labor. Cambridge University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael Gurven (2004). Tolerated Reciprocity, Reciprocal Scrounging, and Unrelated Kin: MaKing Sense of Multiple Models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):572-579.
Peter J. Richersonb, Influences on Communication About Reproduction: The Cultural Evolution of Low Fertility.
H. J. Rose (1954). C. W. Westrup: A Near-Kin Within the Kïn. A Comparative Study. (K. Danske Vidensk. Selskab, Hist.-Fil. Medd. 33. 4.) Pp. 26. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1952. Paper, Kr. 3. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 4 (02):178-.
Lesley Newson & Tom Postmes (2005). Less Restricted Mating, Low Contact with Kin, and the Role of Culture. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):291-292.
Douglas Allchin (2009). The Evolution of Morality. Evolution 2 (4):590-601.
C. Hertogh (1987). Life and the Scientific Concept of Life. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2 (2).
Robin O. Andreasen (2000). Race: Biological Reality or Social Construct? Philosophy of Science 67 (3):666.
Marc Ereshefsky (2010). What's Wrong with the New Biological Essentialism. Philosophy of Science 77 (5):674-685.
Adolph Portmann (1990). On the Uniqueness of Biological Research. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (5):457-472.
Douglas T. Kenrick & Jill M. Sundie (2005). How Do Cultural Variations Emerge From Universal Mechanisms? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):827-828.
J. M. Appel (2009). Is All Fair in Biological Warfare? The Controversy Over Genetically Engineered Biological Weapons. Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (7):429-432.
Added to index2012-01-04
Total downloads18 ( #193,474 of 1,789,836 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #420,676 of 1,789,836 )
How can I increase my downloads?