David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Considering the philosophic intelligence that has set out to discredit it, intentionalism in critical interpretation has shown an uncanny resilience. Beginning perhaps most explicitly with the New Criticism, continuing through the analytic tradition in philosophy, and culminating most recently in deconstructionism, philosophers and literary theorists have kept under sustained attack the notion that authorial intention can provide a guide to interpretation, a criterion of textual meaning, or a standard for the validation of criticism. Yet intentionalist criticism still has avid theoretical defenders and plenty of informal practitioners. The essay that follows, while an exercise in neither such defense nor practice, nevertheless attempts to demonstrate why intentional questions can be expected to be of permanent concern to criticism.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Vivienne Brown (2007). Historical Interpretation, Intentionalism and Philosophy of Mind. Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (1):25-62.
Alan Zaitchik (1980). Intentionalism and Computational Psychology. Grazer Philosophische Studien 10:149-166.
Gary Iseminger (1996). Actual Intentionalism Vs. Hypothetical Intentionalism. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 54 (4):319-326.
Jonas Åkerman (2009). A Plea for Pragmatics. Synthese 170 (1):155 - 167.
Stephen Davies (2006). Authors' Intentions, Literary Interpretation, and Literary Value. British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (3):223-247.
Robert A. Stecker (2006). Moderate Actual Intentionalism Defended. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (4):429-438.
A. Huddleston (2012). The Conversation Argument for Actual Intentionalism. British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (3):241-256.
Sheila Lintott (2002). When Artists Fail: A Reply to Trivedi. British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (1):64-72.
Anthony E. Hatzimoysis (2003). Emotional Feelings and Intentionalism. In A. Hatimoysis (ed.), Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. Cambridge University Press 105-111.
Jukka Mikkonen (2009). Intentions and Interpretations: Philosophical Fiction as Conversation. Contemporary Aesthetics 7.
Georges Rey (2004). A Deflated Intentionalist Alternative to Clark's Unexplanatory Metaphysics. Philosophical Psychology 17 (4):519-540.
Pierre Le Morvan (2008). Sensory Experience and Intentionalism. Philosophy Compass 3 (4):685-702.
Greg Janzen (2008). Intentionalism and Change Blindness. Philosophia 36 (3):355-366.
Jerrold Levinson (2010). Defending Hypothetical Intentionalism. British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (2):139-150.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads18 ( #203,638 of 1,902,049 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #466,347 of 1,902,049 )
How can I increase my downloads?