William of auvergne and st. Thomas Aquinas on the real distinction between being and essence
In Jeremiah Hackett, William E. Murnion & Carl N. Still (eds.), Being and Thought in Aquinas. Global Academic Pub. (2004)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Scott MacDonald (1984). The Esse/Essentia Argument in Aquinas's De Ente Et Essentia. Journal of the History of Philosophy 22 (2):157-72.
Joshua Parens & Joseph C. Macfarland (2011). Thomas Aquinas and Peter of Auvergne, Commentary on the Politics. In Joshua Parens & Joseph C. Macfarland (eds.), Medieval Political Philosophy: A Sourcebook. Cornell University Press.
John Goheen (1940). The Problem of Matter and Form in the De Ente Et Essentia of Thomas Aquinas. Cambridge, Mass.,Harvard University Press.
William M. Walton (1950). Being, Essence and Existence for St. Thomas Aquinas: Being and Its Intelligibility. The Review of Metaphysics 3 (3):339 - 365.
William M. Walton (1951). Being, Essence and Existence for St. Thomas Aquinas (II): Being: That Which Is. The Review of Metaphysics 5 (1):83 - 108.
Mark D. Gossiaux (2003). Thomas Aquinas and Giles of Rome on the Existence of God as Self-Evident. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (1):57-79.
David S. Oderberg (2009). The Non-Identity of the Categorical and the Dispositional. Analysis 69 (4):677-684.
Germain Kopaczynski (1985). A Real Distinction in St. Thomas Aquinas? Philosophy Research Archives 11:127-140.
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |

