David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoria 15 (1):59-85 (2000)
The ’microcausality’ condition in quantum field theory is typically presented and justified on the basis of general principles of physical causality. I explore in detail a number of alternative causal interpretations of this condition. I conclude that none is fully satisfactory, independent of further and controversial assumptions about the object and scope of quantum field theories. In particular the stronger causalreadings require a fully reductionist and fundamentalist attitude to quantum field theory. I argue, in a deflationary spirit, for a reading of the ‘microcausality’ condition as merely a boundary condition, inspired by Relativity, that different possible formulations of quantum field theory must obey
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jordi Cat (2000). Must the Microcausality Condition Be Interpreted Causally?: Beyond Reduction and Matters of Fact. Theoria 15 (1):59-85.
Iain Martel (2008). The Principle of the Common Cause, the Causal Markov Condition, and Quantum Mechanics: Comments on Cartwright. In Luc Bovens, Carl Hoefer & Stephan Hartmann (eds.), Nancy Cartwright's Philosophy of Science. Routledge. 242-262.
Don Robinson (1994). The History and Philosophy of Quantum Field Theory. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:61 - 68.
Peter J. Riggs (1996). Spacetime or Quantum Particles: The Ontology of Quantum Gravity? In P. Riggs (ed.), Natural Kinds, Laws of Nature and Scientific Methodology. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 211--226.
F. A. Muller & Jeremy Butterfield (1994). Is Algebraic Lorentz-Covariant Quantum Field Theory Stochastic Einstein Local? Philosophy of Science 61 (3):457-474.
Jeffrey A. Barrett (1996). Empirical Adequacy and the Availability of Reliable Records in Quantum Mechanics. Philosophy of Science 63 (1):49-64.
Harvey R. Brown & Rom Harré (eds.) (1988). Philosophical Foundations of Quantum Field Theory. Oxford University Press.
David H. Sanford (1976). The Direction of Causation and the Direction of Conditionship. Journal of Philosophy 73 (8):193-207.
F. A. Muller & M. P. Seevinck (2007). Is Standard Quantum Mechanics Technologically Inadequate? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (3):595 - 604.
Laura Ruetsche (2003). A Matter of Degree: Putting Unitary Inequivalence to Work. Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1329-1342.
Kirk A. Ludwig (1994). Causal Relevance and Thought Content. Philosophical Quarterly 44 (176):334-353.
Hans Günter Dosch, Volkhard F. Müller & Norman Sieroka, Quantum Field Theory, its Concepts Viewed From a Semiotic Perspective.
Geoffrey Hellman (1982). Stochastic Einstein-Locality and the Bell Theorems. Synthese 53 (3):461 - 504.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads38 ( #47,982 of 1,100,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #190,060 of 1,100,087 )
How can I increase my downloads?